The Law and Home Schooling
Home Home Schooling Bible Studies Links

 

 

HOME SCHOOLING AND THE LAW

by Terri L. White

The 1980's ushered in an awareness with believers that all was not well with our government schools. Cautiously, families began to band together to form private academies or strike out on their own into the home schooling frontier. Today, possibly one million children are being educated at home, in addition to the thousands of private schools training our children. The early years were burdened with government harassment and court cases, but home and private schools are currently legal in every state.

Laws, however, vary from state to state. In Texas, home schoolers enjoy the freedom to educate their children without any government regulation. Classified as private schools, they are minimally required to teach reading, spelling, grammar, math, and a course in good citizenship. Other states, though, may mandate annual testing, registration, text book approval, teacher certification, or even weekly "check-ups" with an assigned teacher from the local government school. Because these regulations vary from state to state, it is wise to become familiar with one’s state laws while investigating the possibility of home schooling.  The  National Center for Home Education (National Center for Home Education, One Patrick Henry Circle, Purcellville, VA 20132, Ph - 540 338 7600)  catalogs the current legal status for home schooling in every state, along with contacts for local support groups, and can provide you with pertinent information upon request.

Besides being familiar with the local laws, an understanding of your constitutional rights as a parent is imperative. According to John Whitehead, the constitutional attorney and founder of the Rutherford Institute, the right of parents to control the education of their children is protected by numerous provisions of the United States Constitution, including free exercise of religion, free speech, family privacy, and parental liberty, and has been consistently recognized by the courts. 

In the landmark case of Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972), the United States Supreme Court stated: The history and culture of Western civilization reflect a strong tradition of parental concern for the nurture and upbringing of their children. This primary role in the upbringing of their children is now established beyond debate as an enduring American tradition.  

In Pierce v. Society of Sisters (1925), the Supreme Court said: The child is not the mere creature of the state; those who nurture him and direct his destiny have the right, coupled with the high duty, to recognize and prepare him for additional obligations. 

Parents must be accorded reasonable choice and discretion in respect of teachers, curriculum and textbooks ruled People v. Levison (1950).

Although home education is legal nationwide, most home schooling families are opposed to the government regulation common in so many states. You may wonder why. Shouldn’t there be state guidelines and standards to insure that every child receives a thorough education? If standards are not "double standards," home educators will agree that standards can be helpful, although not necessary as mandates. Those who promote standards, however, usually want some kind of testing with a minimum performance required. If the level of performance is not met, then the home schooler would be forced to attend the government school. The problem with this approach is that it is not applied to the students attending the government schools. Perhaps if those in public schools who fell below the minimum standard would be required to home school, we would have a "standard" and not a "double standard." You may chuckle, but it does make the point about the double standard!

A common fallacy about state regulation is that whenever the government controls something, it leads to a quality product. With the public school being one of the most regulated institutions in our nation, it is also the one with the most problems. Studies show no difference between the test scores of home schoolers in unregulated states and those of home educated students in states with extreme regulation. There is no evidence that proves that government control leads to quality education. In fact, there may be evidence to the contrary.

Most home schooling families enjoy the peaceful benefits of our constitutional rights.   Others, however, have been traumatized by intimidating school officials who overextend their jurisdiction in attempts to coerce families to comply with regulations that go beyond the law. Knowledge is power; it dispels fear. Parents that familiarize themselves with their constitutional rights and state laws can avoid the pitfalls of yielding to overbearing government employees, who either do not know the law or who hold malintent towards home schoolers.   Because home education is rapidly becoming an alternative for religious and secular families alike, most government officials are recognizing that we are here to stay. Today, many government representatives are encouraged by the success of home schooling and want to understand more about it. As home schooling parents, we have the opportunity to pave the way for less government regulation for the future generations by standing firm in our constitutional rights and by educating our representatives.

LEGAL ASSISTANCE:

HOME SCHOOL LEGAL DEFENSE ASSOCIATION, P.O. Box 3000, Purcellville, VA 20134, 540-338-5600

RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE, Box 7482, Charlottesville, VA 22906

THE AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE P.O. Box 8100, Virginia Beach, VA 23450-8100

top